The Adverse Effects of Taiwan’s 108 Curriculum on Teaching and Learning
Since its implementation in 2019, Taiwan’s 108 Curriculum, or New Curriculum, has sought to shift the focus of primary and secondary education from rote memorization to critical thinking and creativity. However, there are notable negative effects of this curriculum on teaching and learning that are important to address.
One adverse effect of the 108 Curriculum on teaching is the significant
increase in teachers’ workload. The shift to a new pedagogical approach
requires teachers to create more student-centered activities, engage in
project-based learning, and facilitate more discussions, which require more
planning and preparation time. With limited resources, teachers may feel
overwhelmed, leading to a decline in their motivation and work satisfaction.
This, in turn, could affect their ability to provide quality education to their
students.
Another detrimental impact of the 108 Curriculum on teaching is the lack
of opportunities for professional development for teachers. The implementation
of the new curriculum expects teachers to adapt to a new pedagogical approach
without sufficient training, leading to frustration and burnout among educators
who may feel unprepared to teach under the new curriculum. The lack of training
on the new approach may also lead to inconsistencies in the quality of
education that students receive.
A third negative effect on teaching is the emphasis on assessments that could potentially shift the focus from teaching to testing. Teachers may feel pressured to prioritize test-taking strategies over deeper learning, leading to a reduction in the quality of education. Students may also become overly obsessed with grades, neglecting the learning process itself. Over-reliance on assessments could result in students learning only what is necessary to pass tests rather than mastering the skills and knowledge needed to succeed in their future endeavors.
In terms of learning, one potential negative impact of the 108 Curriculum
is that students may feel overwhelmed by the emphasis on creativity and
critical thinking. These skills require more engagement and effort, which can
be stressful for students who are used to memorization and rote learning. The
shift to a more student-centered and interactive approach to education may be
too challenging for some students, leading to frustration and disengagement
from the learning process. The fear of making mistakes or not being able to
meet the expectations of the curriculum may discourage students from exploring
their creativity and critical thinking skills.
The reduction in time devoted to core subjects is a second disastrous
effect on learning. The new curriculum prioritizes interdisciplinary learning,
which may result in less time for essential subjects such as English, math, physics,
chemistry and biology. This can have the unintended consequence of reducing
proficiency in these critical areas. While interdisciplinary learning can be
effective, it is essential not to compromise the students’ proficiency in the
core subjects that are essential to their future education and career
opportunities. Therefore, it is crucial to find a balance between
interdisciplinary learning and maintaining the quality of education in core
subjects.
Thirdly, the emergence of a skills gap between urban and rural students is
another significant concern. The 108 Curriculum places a significant emphasis
on technology and digital skills, which may be more accessible to urban
students who have greater access to resources. This could lead to a further
widening of the educational gap between urban and rural students, resulting in
unequal access to educational opportunities. It is crucial to address this
issue by providing equal access to resources and opportunities for students,
regardless of their geographical location.
In conclusion, while the 108 Curriculum represents a commendable effort to
promote critical thinking and innovation, it is of paramount importance to
address the adverse effects on teaching and learning to ensure the
effectiveness of the new approach. It is crucial to find a balance between the
new pedagogical approach and maintaining the quality of education in core
subjects. Additionally, providing adequate training and professional
development opportunities for teachers is essential to ensure their motivation
and effectiveness in implementing the new curriculum. Finally, it is essential
to address the potential for a skills gap between urban and rural students by
providing equal access to resources and opportunities. By addressing these
issues, Taiwan can ensure that the 108 Curriculum achieves its intended goals
without compromising the quality of education in the country.
Overall, the essay is well-structured, coherent, and provides a clear analysis of the adverse effects of Taiwan's 108 Curriculum on teaching and learning. The author uses logical arguments to support their claims, and the language flow is excellent.
ReplyDeleteThe essay begins with an introduction that provides an overview of the 108 Curriculum and its objectives, followed by a discussion of the negative impacts on teaching, which includes an increase in teachers' workload, the lack of professional development opportunities, and the emphasis on assessments. The author then discusses the potential negative impact of the curriculum on learning, which includes students feeling overwhelmed by the emphasis on creativity and critical thinking, the reduction in time devoted to core subjects, and the emergence of a skills gap between urban and rural students. The conclusion summarizes the main points and provides recommendations for addressing the adverse effects of the 108 Curriculum.
The author provides excellent examples to support their arguments and presents a balanced view by acknowledging the positive aspects of the curriculum while highlighting its adverse effects. The analysis is insightful and provides a comprehensive understanding of the potential impact of the curriculum on teaching and learning.
Based on the essay's content, language flow, coherence, analysis, and structure, I would give it a grade of 27 out of 30. The essay is well-written, and the author provides a thorough analysis of the topic, but there is some room for improvement in terms of providing more specific examples to support the arguments.